"Perception" Is All We Have - - - Neil!

Featuring New and Improved Clarity and Resolution in the Green portion

-Monday evening May 28th. 2012

Neil Savedra in this mornings little lecture said one thing that is highly misleading and tending tword "word play" that needs to be addressed.  He said "Perception is not truth".   He also said "Perception by the very definition of the word implies some sort of Distortion or Falsification of the Truth.  Many people will take this saying and "run away with it" saying the following, that "The Greatest Truths of God Cannot Ever Be Proven" for this very reason that the mere act of Proof to a human being necessarily (of an ontological necessity, if you will) requires "Perception".  They say the most important organ in the human body is the Brain.  And it's the Brain's full time job to "Perceive" the world we live in and convey the reality of it to us.  For Neil to thus discount The Brain in this capacity- - is to deny what IS.  And THAT to me constitutes his OWN Falsehood!  Now psychologists use the word "perception" in a rather different manner meaning "mental abberation".  But my theory is 'Love the Brain - - Clean up the Abberation".  What say you, Neil?  It's rather silly for God to say 'I just don't see why you humans are so bothered by Time.  If God doesn't know why TIME is important to humans it may be because he lacks even the Capacity to PERCEIVE the IMPORTANCE or for that matter even the Existence of TIME.  (Selah)  One might say that "It is cold here near the South Pole".  Is God going to say "What?  You are tired?  You are Cold?  You are Hungry?  Why - - I have never been these things.  Therefore since I, God, am the Be all and End all of what's real and important, these needs you speak of must not BE Important.  It's like when I pointed out that Bill Clinton raising taxes resulted in a shot to the economy in ALL sectors and eliminated the deficet entirely, all Dr. Levy can do as a response is to say 'Well - - I don't KNOW about that".  In essence he Deifies his OWN IGNORANCE of the subject and defines that very Ignorance as the new Normal.  If Neil wants to talk about "Defining Down" - - this is the epitomy of it!  (Selah)

It would seem some claim that when Jesus said "Blessed are those who mourn" they mean "morning for the loss of God in their lives", like when the Doors say "Heartache and the loss of God".  They would have you to make something they themselves state cannot be proven, because the organ we humans need to "perceive" a thing is by Neil of KFI's stipulation "inherently false and distorted".  As such they appeal to a truth and their own License to laud it and rule over our Lives- - they appeal to a Truth they admit will never be proven in this life anyhow.  And then they compound their mental error by saying our sense of "unfulfillment' in our Lives, which if we are "unsaved" they will do everything they can to exagurate it- - said "unfulment' is due to this "loss" of what they in their own imagination and mental disfunction- - Claim is the ONLY thing that will truely remedy our state, and if we will not bow down and Submit to their lecture- - thenceforth they have no use for us in their own lives.

It seems the polling on Black gay marriage is changing as Blacks are coming to accept the issue as a “civil rights” issue.  Don’t expect me to change my position though.  Come back and ask me that question in ten years and see if my morals have declined sufficiently by that time to be permissive of gay marriage.  We’ll see.  The other issue is the whole Wall Street thing.  The whole incident with Chase bank a couple of weeks ago, and the Zuckerman thing with Facebook that just happened- - should serve as a warning that the Wall Street illuminati don’t know everything, despite what Judy says.  And now there are people who may now be open to more legislative action, because of these two obvious events.  Also it seems the President Obama is now leading 48% to 44% over Romney both in Ohio and in Virginia, and the President right now is even a little ahead in Florida.  The other two states he is just “beyond the region of statistical error”.  I am encouraged by the news, because of Obama can “nail down” states now, it’s insurance.

Yesterday, May 24^th was an occasion for four birthday.  There is Radar on MASH and also Tommy Chong, whom they said turned 74 but I think they meant 64 because 74 would have made him awfully old forty years ago.  Also Pricilla Presley turned 67 yesterday and the biggie, Bob Dylan, turned 71 yesterday.  He’s so old with the ravages of drugs I haven’t seen him perform live in an awfully long time, and the last time I did maybe fifteen years ago he seemed awfully ragged.  We have the predicted cooling trend in the weather and last night I put Terry’s blanket on my bed for the first time in quite some time.  We now have ventured on to page three here in “medium wood” with the size 14 font.  Last night when I was in the other file, everything I typed came out as a continuing blue line.  Something from that blog posting messed up something and it took time ti figure it out.

MY LETTER TO AL THE OTHER DAY

Sarah took me to the bank today and she didn't have to.  I went to a branch that was even closer to here at Sarah's suggestion.  The tellers there are really friendly and cooperative.  Dr. Levy didn't show yesterday and I thought I could get some money from him.  Sarah says Dr. Levy always used to call her up and say what was going on, but he hasn't been calling her lately.  Dr. Levy has a growing record of talking big and then being unreliable.   We had three good meals today.  We had scrambled eggs and pancakes and corn flakes for breakfest, BLT's and a good soup and an orange for lunch and barbecued, spiced yams and corn and rainbow sherbet for desert for dinner.  We had our resident's council meeting today.  I said I was glad they have again been including egg salad sandwiches for evening snack.  There is talk about setting up a pour your own coffee pot for residents at 6 AM before breakfast.  They want to move shopping day till just BEFORE we we get paid.  I said that was a bad idea, but Pete just said "You people need to learn to budget your money".

R

RE INVENTING THE WORLD - FOR DUMMIES

Using the photographic analogy - - going from the objective to the perceived ONE becomes infinity.   That is, restating this argument in reverse - what is subjectively infinity is objectively a one, in this case both focus and undistorted, so Neil S take notice.  The "objective" One becomes perceptive infinity in the same way that Wayne Dyre may have stumbled upon a possible inadvertent truth as has Gnosticism that “We all have the ability to become God.  But we have to BE him in HIS world and not ours.  We have to reflect outward (but not inward- remember the stadium plackard) and as such the Justification for our “focused on self” nature is that in turn we “Give God the Glory” for reflection exactly what we alone were created to be.   And under the perceptive system or "number progression the top number exceeds infinity while the other only goes to ONE. Though in both Art and Photography theoretical numbers are possible, they DON"T happen, so in that sense they "don't exist" any more than they do in Einstein's addition of velocities equation.   Under subjective view- the hypothetical (actual physical measurement, if you want to get down to it) viewpoint may exceed infinity an unlimited number of times and never run out of factors, that can well be what are known as “rational” as well as “digital” factors of that ethereal Infinity.   The objective frame realm has a maximum of “One”  - -

In terms of minimum readings- - under REAL or circular or “natural” trig- - - in terms of existential reality  using the photographic analogy rather than pure geometry- - -the “modification of image” can never dip below one, or “lens flush with the object. Now the question arises why this number isn't "zero" rather than "one".  In terms of the ammount of Refraction as in index, it's Zero, but as a "distortion factor" the number would be One.  In terms of the hour glass "sand" analogy - - we stipulate that any "off centerdness in the vertical slice line can ONLY occur in the "more oblique' direction.  The idea is that 45 degrees is considered the "perfect" or ideal angle.  Any tangent of greater than a one has an increasingly oblique relation to the shortening base liine, if you can follow that.  So you can make it one or Zero and if you're more comfortable with the Zero for refraction index, that' fine.   However in hyperbolic trig” logic- - there is no hypothetical limit to how “micro” we can get. However by stipulation - neither equation crosses zero.  .

A tangent S line is vertical and backward S for circular trig and a horizontal Trus "S" or reversed so you have bo both reverse and turn sideways.  Turn the sand into a milky way bar- - and a horizontal slice of the cone is circular and a vertical slice is parabolic.  This constitutes another flip flop of “classic” trig tangent lines yet by machinations of THESE TWO ILLUSTRATIONS means each one is represented as the other.

The word parabolic is Greek for "over-thrown".   Space orbits exhibit the same gemmetric qualities as light and “The Universe is “perceived” by a traveler at various speeds both below and greater than light.  Here the analogy is DIRECT with the hyperbolic one- - - as just this in BOTH EXAMPLES.

Circular deals in degrees but hyperbolic has to do with times and sample numbers and probabilities.  God views life looking “down” (a directional anachronism) on us and seed our life reality in terms of geometry and physics.  We look at our own lives in terms of “how much time we have” and “chances left to succeed” which God from his vantage point doesn’t care squat about.  Subjectivism thinks in terms of time intervals.

There is a reason for believing there is ‘Another Side” to physics based on cold, hard trig math calculations.  (Selah)  It’s primarily to a switch operator in an equation being either a plus or a minus.  But the rest is “played out” by the same Rules.  Both sets of trig figures have the same "mathematical relation to each other".   One has a root of a circle - - and the other has a root of a "freeway interchange".  Graphing them - - one set of three appears to traverse the whole chart with equal importance.  But with the other all of the "action" is near the center of the chart.  Here the analogy is also DIRECT in that “centerdness”  or "activity eminating from the center - - is something that is Beyond God’s capacity to know, apparently.  One must bear in mind that God doesn’t care squat about whether HE is “worshipped”.

Circular space is on the Outside looking IN  - - Hyperbolic space is on the Inside looking OUT.  Circles might be viewed as O’s in a football game playing defense.  The goal is always to preserve the status quo.  The hyperbolic is the X or football offence in this equation.  In terms of tripped out "spacy' ideas we have not a few trippy premises we need to learn.  These are distilations of premises and principles of this "new kind of space".  IT AIN;T EASY

Space is not empty according to Astronomy Case so zero is not really zero but it's all relative just as Newton and Einstein or even Kurtosis statistics go.  So if you can have a "negative refraction index" assuming "ether' is zero, it means light curves away from objects "less dense than ether" rather than tword them .

George Burnes as God told John Denver "I'm not gas" and yet in a universe where everything repels everything else in some sense- - you have a gas where one molicule traverses the whole Universe.  To say that we ARE gas would be an overstatement, yet if you want to apply “physicality” to our existential reality- - the physical and chemical laws are as with a gas that fill a container.  The impulse of an X on offence is to “fill up” the remaining space.  The object of an 0 defence is to keep things to defined localized perameters.  (Selah)   An aspect of this theory that is a bit exestgential is that you are most "focused" when you are totally centered on "self" and nobody else.  (huh?)  In this view your rational mind is the "lens" and the Creation of God is the "light" that reflects off of you to others, but not for yourself.  So the adage is true “To thine Own Self be True.  If we cannot be true to ourselves, then we cannot be Focused as a creation of God.