Let’s discuss this Washington’s Blog video on 9 – 11. It is the most extensive presentation on the topic of whether the twin towers were brought down by explosives. The crushing weight of evidence is overwhelming in this instance, such that there can be no doubt that the buildings were brought down by a pre planned demolition take down. Previously we told you that people in the media knew that “Tower Seven” would come down before the fact, and more than one media outlet announced that tower seven or “The Solomon building” was in fact taken down before it was. Kerosene burns at sixteen hundred degrees, and yet this still was heated to the point of being molten and dripping down the elevator shaft. But of course steel still has its full structural integrity at that temperature and doesn't become molten till 2700 degrees or a thousand degrees hotter than it got. Also the buildings were burning with black smoke which they say is an "oxygen starved fire' and presumably less hot that it would otherwise be. I'd always heard "Black smoke means incomplete combustion". Yet there was molten steel burning under ground for no less than three months after 9 – 11, and nobody questions how the steel ever got that hot. The commission- - this book in excess of 500 pages is pure lies and bullshit. It said the steel was eighteen hundred degrees and “was becoming unstable”. In the history of major high rises there have been only three cases of the frame of a building coming down from fire- - and you guessed it- - it was the three buildings that burned on 9 – 11. In fact, we learn from ‘Burn Notice” that crashing into a car’s gas tank won’t guarantee that the fuel will explode, and it’s my understanding that kerosene is slightly less combustible than the gasoline you put in your car - - technically known as try methyl pentane. We already told you about those two explosions with each plane that occurred just BEFORE the respective planes hit the building. Perhaps this was to insure the kerosene would ignite. We have the evidence of the violent explosions- - shooting out major heavy steel pillars weighing thousands of pounds going hundreds of miles an hour impailing themselves into other buildings. There are an overwhelming number of witnesses that reported explosions before the fact, including George Stephanopolis. Worst of all there was thermite in generous quantities found- - and a special type of military grade thermite called nano-thermite, which has Iron as a major explosive component. Most of your home made bombs are nitrogen and phosphorous based. But in the portion of the video I watched this morning they went more into other peripheral aspects, such as the way the media has been brainwashed to cover this event. People are subject to the most severe of rebuke and mockery if they even suggest the buildings didn’t fall of their own accord. As you know there have been raging infernos in high rises- - like in other countries- - where the fires burn for hours on end- - and still the buildings don’t come down. We - - were lied to saying ‘Oh they design these buildings so they are easy to take down and fall into their own footprint”. From what I saw last night this just isn’t so. The buildings are built to stay up. People buy into this “pancaking floors” argument. They have seen floors pancake like this in documentary films, probably from pre existing structural damage caused by a severe earthquake. Just think of this one example. You say “Well the weight of each floor above the one falling just adds to the weight each time so the building falls faster and faster”. Here is something you may never have considered. What is keeping the buildings UP to begin with? Magic pixie dust. It’s not as though any weight is ADDED to a collapsing building that wasn’t THERE all along. The structural engineers put an enormous amount of effort in the design of these high rises. And it takes days or even weeks of placing of explosives in a building to bring them down. In fact there was a ten day period in late August through September 2nd of 2001 that there was a flurry of activity in the Twin Towers. And for a long time there was drilling and all sorts of stuff because people were told “We are modernizing the elevator shafts”. My slogan tends to be, “If it ain’t broken, don’t fix it”. We then get into the enormous amount of Government connection with headquarters in all three of these buildings. We have the company that “investigated” the event after 9 – 11 for the 9 – 11 Official Government Report. They said “We know there were no explosives involved. In fact we are so sure of this we did not even INVESTIGATE for explosives. Neither did they say anything in the report at all about Building Seven. This is beyond strange. Of course NORAD was ordered to stand down that day. But then we have the story to begin with about a Boston flight being hijacked by terrorists armed with nothing but - - box cutters. Box cutters! This is crazy! You mean two seasoned Pilots who have undergone rigorous training are just going to hand the plane over to terrorists without firearms without a fight? And of course no autopsies of anyone aboard were ever done. And the steel debris from the twin towers was immediately shipped off to China. And yet if I raise ANY of these points I am equated with the tin foil hat and black helicopter people? All Sean Hannity has to say by way of intimidation is “Talk of any 9 – 11 conspiracy is silly because we all saw those buildings being hit on live TV and the fires burning for ourselves”. Let’s talk more about how the media kept saying, and I heard them “These buildings are going to come down”, and “The structural integrity of these buildings will never hold”. They were setting us up with lies- - preparing us so that when we saw the buildings actually implode before our eyes- - we would believe what the media wanted us to believe- - - and not be left to wonder or speculate on our own.
The
other topic discussed in George Washington’s blog was- - this whole idea that
the United States makes and breaks “regimes”.
We put in governments till we get
tired of them – and then we take them out.
Like Bill Cosby was so fond of saying “Son, I brought you into this
world – and I can take you Out”, as though that’s supposed to be funny. Of course our government toppled Iran, and we
toppled Iraq- - twice - - and we even
toppled the pro Soviet government in Afghanistan in 1979 - - and now we learn
we overthrew the government of Syria was toppled by our CIA in 1949, and we
even tried it again in 1957 that but attempt was unsuccessful. Our government has so many impliments of war
we don’t know what to do with them! We
hake War for profit – not national security - - and this has been true for 25
years and probably longer. Now some
General states that he told Obama we’ll have to have ground troops if we hope
for success against ISIS. From listening
to yesterday’s Bill Press show this morning, it’s plain that Mission Creep is
already a reality. We already have “imbedded”
special forces troops in Iraq and perhaps Syria. We are training Syrian rebels to fight on our
side. And in this I tend to be in
agreement. But others say “And just when
will these weapons and technology we give these people be turned around and
used against Us”. We know that ISIS
likes to recruit moderate Sunni Muslems.
We took down the whole infrastructure of Iraq as Hartman and others
remind us. We not only disbanded their
entire army but also their entire government and financial structure to make
way for a Milton Freedman type economic eutopia, according to Hartman. Hartman again read from this October 2004
manifesto or whatever of Bin Laden who bragged that all they had to do was
create the slightest bit of terror or fear- - and the United States would spend
a million dollars for every dollar that Al Qaeda spent. Talk about bang for your buck. At this point the thought hit me this morning
“Fear is our worst enemy”. Fear in this
case distorts our judgement the way that alcohol and cocaine distort a person’s
judgement. It makes us do things
impulsively without thinking. First we
hear that this war with ISIS will still be raging come election time in 2016. But now we hear that two years is too
optimistic a timetable for the elimination of ISIS. Nobody ever told these people that you can’t
make war against an Idea. You can’t
defeat an Idea with bombs. (Selah) Look at the Christians in the second half of
the third century under Roman oppression.
The Christians never had such a rise in new recruits. Nobody ever looks at the problem and
concludes “Nothing we do is working in the least. Perhaps we should rethink everything”. President Obama plays into the hands of
these right wingers because of his continued in-artful remarks such as “We don’t
have a stragegy” or “These ISIS people are like the Junior Varsity team” or
even “I guarantee there will be no ground troops”. People like Hannity call this remark “Tipping
the enemy off in advance of what we WON”T do”.
But also when Obama says “We don’t even NEED a war authorization because
the 1991 war resolution is still in effect.
The President can’t be that ignorant that authorizations for the
military can only last a maximum of two years.
It says that right in the US Constitution – which I’m sure the President
must have read sometime. I listened to
Loretta Sanchez’ speech yesterday in Congress and she made a lot of good
points. But remember that George W Bush
regarded his fathers limited war against Iraq in 1991 as a failure, because a
much longer war would have given him “political capital”. But such a protracted War would never have been politically acceptable in 1991 because the people hadn't been "prepped" to accept such a war yet. There can be virtually no doubt now that Bush
and Chaney and Rmusfeld and the whole bunch of them are sociopathic - - and
deserve to be put on trial- - and for you death penalty fans- - these are your
picture postcard examples of why the death penalty should be implemented. The actions of these men is beyond
criminal Vincent Bugliosi in a book ten
years ago even said that these War Mongers were criminals and ought to be
brought up on any number of International treaty violations.
I
have a few observations about equal employment.
While I see a possible reason for firing an employee for chronic
complaining and lowering the morale of “the team” I hardly see why expressing
an opinion here or there is any major offence.
I consider it a primary violation of my freedom of speech to compare
salaries received with those other workers get.
I would call this “the self preservation instinct”. But above all I think it should be, and
probably IS against the law to ever be forced to waive your rights to sue the
company for blatant or less than blatant worker safety violations. I would make it a part of the law that any
such signatures were inherently null and void.
But having said that, as you know I’m just as hard on liberals as I am
on conservatives, and when one of them messes up they hear about it from
me. In today’s case this woman on Thom
Hartman’s discussion panel raised the point that “comparing apples to apples”
if a woman is single and identically qualified with a man similarly single- -
the woman in this case will get paid ten percent MORE than a man. If this so- - then all talk about pay
inequity goes in the trash can. And I
would also add that women and men are biologically different, in case it
escaped your notice. Men can’t have
babies. And it’s unreasonable for a
woman to demand several weeks off to have her baby, and not have her pay
docked. I have also heard that the 78%
figure we’ve been hearing quoted on salary equity since- - probably 1978 - -
may be bogusly calculated. I’ve heard
that if you were really unbiased and took every relevant factor into
consideration, it’s be closer to ninety percent.
It was Norman Goldman who may have said that
we must vote democratic for US Senator at least because they appoint the
federal judges. As you know Harry Reed
got the whole filibuster rule knocked out for such federal appointments. So I hope he “cleared the decks” because the
nominations were piling up, and when - - the republicans take over the Senate
in November we won’t have a prayer. As
it stands now most of the Federal judges were appointed by the two Bushes,
because Clinton only put in moderates or blue dog democrats - - and Obama
apparently has gotten very few appointments through this intransigent congress.
I
turned on the Rush Limbaugh show. Rush
made a cood case that the NFL is not unique in either battered wives or child abuse,
but that NFL arrest rates are actually only about half of what they are in the
average Black culture. I’m not sure if
it’s a complement or not but Rush says “You know- - getting to the NFL is the
best thing for their character that happened to these young men because it may
well the first actual discipline situation they’d had in their entire
lives.” OK - -I’ll try and accept that
bit of news.
No comments:
Post a Comment