What You See Is What You Get

On the whole Cosmos show Sunday nights at nine on FOX, they like to “stick it to God”.  Last week it was with massive evolution of Dogs in a very short period of time, in the overall geological scheme of things.  This week it was “star dust’ from a comet carrying the secrets of the universe.  Or at least that’s thought they’d talk about- - how our upper atmosphere could hold a whole lot of secrets we don’t even know about, which was on the news lately.  But they talked about Isaac Newton who was born in England in 1642 and hung out at Cambridge University as some sort of a recluse even at a young age.  Though Isaac Newton was a believer in God - -most people back then were.  As the show stressed "We are just then emerging into the era of true science and scientific method and the Latin for "see for yourself" and leaving behind a more superstitious age where- - actually Astrology was much more prominent with Kings and such.  Newton studied all the Greek myths and stuff and like eccentrics of today even, studied the Bible for coded messages in the text.  But they note that "None of Newtons investigations into "God" ever panned out.  This is one detail all the fundamentalists leave out of their little spiel.  (Selah)  And these three other guys would all hang out together in the original version of a “coffee house’ where they’d get into arguments, and even wagers about the mysteries of the universe with brains all hyped up on caffeine.   The three were Halley of Halley’s comet fame, and a guy named Hook and a guy named Rend (?).  But this Hook guy was always saying he invented stuff before Isaac Newton did, even though he could never produce the goods, or had the math skills.  Newton told Halley while still a young man in his twenties (?) that he had “figured out the formula for gravity five years ago”.  And that it varied with the square of the distance.   This to me is another of those areas where I thought the formula would be a whole lot more complicated than that.  Perhaps it involves some explanation however.  If you sit four feet away from a fire in a fire place, you’re going to feel pretty warm.  If you sit eight feet away from the fire you’re only going to be one quarter as affected by the heat of that same fire.  However, you may ask me with gravity, if a sky diver jumps out of a plane at ten thousand feet, where there is still enough oxygen- - and someone else is flying at twenty thousand feet and a Bowing 767 flight is flying at forty thousand feet, you may well ask “Are you telling me the Boeing 767 people on that flight will only experience one sixteenth the gravity of the sky diver before he jumped?”  No.   The answer as best as I can come up with is that earth not only pulls you DOWN but also has a lateral motion pull in all directions in addition to straight down.  We only feel it as Down because this is the agragate or mean of the pull.  But what Newton did essentially was to “destroy the reason or need for God”.  Because others viewed the motions of the planets as some giant but mysterious Clock created by a master clock maker, God.  Now the mystery is gone.  Kepler had come up with his equal area theory.  That is when measured in Elapsed Time- - - movement along orbital line - - were you to divide up the area within the orbit into pie shaped slices- - all of the slices would be equal in area.  One would think from discovery of this fact along –no matter Kepler did it- - the formula for gravity itself would be deducible.   In my own “Rocket into space” Program- - I allow for a one time acceleration “liability” for gravity- - but I do not allocate this force over Time.  Just to finish the thought- this would obviously be the Escape velocity of 26,000 miles per hour rated by the size of the rocket, so that a rocket carrying more fuel would require more lift to compensate for the added weight of the fuel, and naturally I just guessed this amount- for the program.   Rockets for turning would be based on trig functions based on the needed degree of the turn or adjustment required.  For this function it's assumed that the ship is carrying much less fuel by now.  

This is a late edition paragraph on Putin.  People may wonder "Well, you have an explanation for everything.  What is your take on Russia and why they are like they are now?"  We talked about Edmoites later in this file and even a few old time Bible teachers make the Edomite connection based on the "Red" word used for both Russians and Edomites.  We ourselves use the term to describe the clay like soil on Aldeberan VIII.   I say this because I do not believe it's "The Chicago boys" exporting the Mafia to Russia.  This is obviously a classic Tea Party "pay to play" system, though where money feeds the kitty and makes government opperate.  Portions of the remainder of this file get a little wordy and gangaly, and I'd tried to fix some of that by re-editing.  But this idea of the Tea Party loving Putin is not a real big surprise- - Cosmically.  I just learned something.  When Germany invaded Poland the West - - England and France- - declared "If the Reich invades Poland, then we're going to war".  But now today I learn that France and England did NOT attack Germany when this happened so that Germany was never under any threat.  Poland therefore now fears whether Russia might invade their country just as, for a time, Hitler was willing to divy up Poland between the two of them.  We hear that Russia may invade Moldolva (I've heare "Moldavia" too)  This nation doesn't even border Russia, so a lot of ground would have to be trampled under foot first.  Even the following spring in the blitzkrig that France and England were powerless to ward off the military juggernaut which was Germany and the Third Reich.  In late 1939 and in early 1940 people spoke of "Phony War", which seems odd to our ears at this point in time, because we are disposed to believe that "The West" at last "Woke Up" and was on the ball after September first of 1939, which so I've been told was a heavy overcast day, much like we are experiancing today.

I wanted to talk about WYSIWYG or “What you see is what you get” the old Jeroldine line from Flip Wilson.   Because just as for instance- - Word Art is something you can pate into Power Point – and edit the letters once you’re there- - most of Word Art is not in Power Point itself but since they both have the same manufacture - - they were made compatible.  It’s kind of like the whole idea between GUI or graphic user interface is “What you see is what you get’ meaning that if I want to do a program with “marching symbols” in Power Point- - I can move the symbols around in each frame or slide to wherever I feel like it- - and don’t have to reduce my desires to some computer code math formula like I would have to do in QBASIC.   So why is the idea that gravity is WYSOWYG so important?  It’s because Gravity behaves exactly the same as light.  So if like in a Black Hole- - light can’t escape the black hole- then neither can gravity, which itself will cause a lot of movie writers to tear up their next scripts.  There is no invisible object out there that’s gona “get you” in the night.   More to the point it means when calculating the positions of stars- - you don’t have to recalculate things to “correct” for where light and gravity differ- because since gravity and light are alike in a lot of senses- - the two can be dealt with as one thing in astronomical calculations, which saves a lot of people a lot of time, so that when you see a star in a certain spot- - in Newton’s eyes, or even Einstein’s for that matter, then THAT indeed is where the star is- - at least physically in terms of its Mass.

One remark of Chris Le Boy flagged my attention today about worm holes being a theoretical possibility.  And that worm holes “enable travel to new, undiscovered dimensions that scientists are pretty sure are out there”   You kind of have to speak in - Theoretical terms - -  because even hypothetically - - speaking of things for which no proof of them exist could get you into trouble.But let’s get back to worm holes.  This is an area where I have almost never "ventured" in my writings.  Because to tell you the truth given the definition of worm holes I'm not sure "theoretically" how you'd go about "creating" one - - even if you're God.  As you know in Star Trek this was discussed in an episode called “The Price” where a worm hole was stable at one end and unstable at the other- - so you could end up X number of pharsecs away- - and I have no idea how big a pharsec is but it’s pretty big.  Chris Le Boy said that worm holes were a “theoretical possibility”.   I hope Chris knows that with Einstein that Black Holes are not even a “theoretical possibility”.  But basically most people view a worm hole as “a Black Hole with an exit point”.   And they usually view worm holes as “mysterious when you enter and exit them and while you’re in them- - but once you get out and you arrive at your destination, then things are physically back to normal again.  If your definition varies from that, let me know.   If Chris is talking about “poly dimensional space” meaning by my geometric definition ‘four or more special dimensions” this is theoretical in a mathematical sense, or counters of loops in string theory.  Maybe Chris was referring to that, which I had forgotten about.   In Star Trek type shows worm holes are viewed as a means of travel usually transversing that dimension we call “hyperspace”, which I have discarded because it relies on the gelatenus or “Jell-O” view of Aether, which I now reject.  It’s the idea that space- - - space in the Void has no meaning.  This of course while true- - but getting to that “Void” to begin with is problematic.   As you may or may not know- - when I get visits from Mal Evans for instance- - he doesn’t waste a whole space ship on the trip- - because psychic links do fine.  And just to state for the record again - - I've been instructed "Specific verbiage or Words- - take precedent over psychic or visual impressions.  It’s only when you need to transport physical objects like cargo or troops or something- - you need a space ship.  However even this is not as impossible as it seems.  Since nine tenths of our weight is binding energy rather than quarks-  or quark triads known as Baryons - it's reasoned that to a degree quarks are "fungible' or interchangable, and that there would be "holes" in the energy mass and like with hooking up a computer, certain shaped plugs only fit in certain shaped jacks.  So they argue that matter reconstruction is 'idiot proof".  Maybe.  People who travel “In the body” like I did that September Sunday in 1986 - - (see prev) travel in space ships - - and these are hard to come by for the average person unless you know who to contact.  (We previously told you that the Edomites of Aldeberan VIII were like the “Forengi’ of the Universe.)  The big problem here of course is to somehow “transport” or “reconstruct” matter from at best what you’d call “energy” or “psychic dimensional energy” for lack of a better term.  The Romulans of course – have a much more efficient way of material transport.  (see different paragraph)  The other way of course is to use an Avatar once you reach your destination.  This could also be a form of Astral Projection and the thing with astral projection - - if it's truely an "out of body" experiance- - then you'll have no memory of it.  Or shall we say the "default" is to NOT remember it, even though very real at the time, but though it happened to your soul, your Body never recorded the incident.  So it's just an engram or two.  We’ll talk about the remaining way right now.  [material removed]    But then I didn't so I'll do it now.  Since gravity is like light- - as with Romulan cloaking - - gravity and light get IN but they don't get OUT, like Roach Motels.  So you are subject to the Gravity alias mass of others but the Universe at large is not subject to Your mass, hence acceleration to great speeds is no problem.  This gives the Romulans a major edge in easier apace travel.   

Chris and Jim and Stephanie too may be wondering “What’s with this inileation factor you talked about with negative space and mass?”  Actually if you have an object of negative space AND negative mass - - it will exist just fine- - but if that negative space has a “congruency” to positive space- - guess what?  You’re talking about the Same Object.   This is a simpler form of the Mal Evans doctrine that speaks of completely (even down to feng chue strings) congruent objects- - in different localities being the Same object, in (some) sense.  Also if Mass and Time go negative, for instance the effect you’d see in running a motion picture backwards- - these too are the “sane objects” just viewed a different way, with the same space, which hasn’t changed.   Sometimes - - you could use the word negative “vector” to allude to movement in time through space.  If you reverse the “time” then obviously the movement through positive space becomes reversed.  Capish?   Really this stuff is not half as complicated as people make it out to be.  As apparently gravity itself is not.  (see previous ref)

Stephanie talked about this idea that liberals use the word “believe” rather than the word “know”, too much.  Because when you say “believe” you could say that people “believe” President Obama is a Moslem, or people who “believe” that Norh’s ark keeps being “found and then being lost again” like people who say they’ve seen the wreckage of that plane but somehow it never happens.  Some people “believe” Jesus washes away their sins and that they are now pure as the driven snow.   So the thing is to say there are certain things such as evolution and global warming that we just “know”.   Of course I regard “belief” is a lesser level of certainty  from being absolutely sure.  Some people “believe” the government is sending ELF waves into their brains and controlling them.  By way of note I made a joke about ELF last year.   Actually if MF - - which doesn’t stand for mother fucker- - ranges from 300 to 3000 kilohertz then LF would be 30 to 300 kilohertz.  Then VLF would be three to thirty kilohertz and ULF would be 300 to 3000 hertz, and SLF would be 30 to 300 hertz, which would be the range of alternating electric current as we know it.  So my joke should have been really about SLF.  ELF then would be three to thirty waves per second of RF.  Were it true that the government WERE sending out frequencies of this sort, tin, aluminum, or lead foil would have absolutely no effect on them.  So there.  We could talk about Romulan flag codes.  Yellow flag means “stop” or “halt” or cease and desist.  And indeed alludes to some sort of “trespass” or “transgression” of the rules.   Green flag means Go.  White Flag- - in the racing metaphor too - - means “on the verge of victory”.   Red flag means “attention” or “challenge” or “alert” but not Stop.  By the way the Victory formation for “U” - - is from the Sirius A Romulan and German word for “Uber” for “Super”.   Black Flag- - - is kind of the “I’ve had it’ flag - - “I’m dropping out of society”.   By the way in Sirius A Romulan the word “Derringer” means “Right thinking person” and the NRA did not pay us to say that.  The word Reisinger means “sailor’ in the sense of you either being the Captain or the crew, but NOT, for example someone on a princess cruise.  (Unless they were shipwrecked or something and the passengers were called on to help, then you’d call them Reisengers.)