It struck me that what Religion is in terms of "underlying themes" is to somehow escape Time itself. There is a desire to escape inevitability and finiteness of pleasures, as well as the rightful consequences of our own actions. But Gospel writers and the like have the desire to escape Time for another reason. Because too often they speak of some Event they are portraying as "A picture of how God is" but often they will interperate events of the Past in the light and shadow of future events that haven't even happened yet. It could be likened to a diary that your little brother broke into and all the loose pages spewed on to the rug and you scoop them all up as best you can and put them back in the box. But the person reading his own diary sees that it's been messed up. And all too often this "messed up chronology" where effect does not follow cause but is somehow distorted into what I call a "Mericals matrix". But then some bright researcher comes along and unscrambles the thing and corrects the mistranslations and isolates the "textural glosses" and puts the thing in its proper historic light. But don't you know the writers of the Gospels are not after "History" but something all together more propagandistic. But religion or the propaganda thereof- - is by its very nature antagonistic to the idea of some historic Time-line chart like a Police Dept might use to investigate or therorize how a crime was comitted. One person who "denied the Resurrection" stated "You cannot - - I dare you - - you cannot construct a flow time-line of events that occurred in the morning when Jesus Christ was said to be resurrected" and may have offered a little money as taunting incentive. It's funny how all these people who offer a million dollars is someone can discover or prove this or that - - but in these cases there never seems to be any takers. There is a Grace Slick song on the album "Dreams" where some Divinity is quoted as saying "If it weren't for Time - - I'd never be defeated". Because time has its way of Sorting out all things. Time is the friend of the Evolution process. Religion is the enemy of belief in Evolution. Many people would like to freeze time and their own emotions at the extacy heights of some Born Again Prayer Meeting- - and countless lovers out there would love to make the moment of their first coming together- - Last Forever. But it doesn't. In the Garden of Eden story the whole human need for "Growth" or "Character Development' seems to be an entirely superfelus question to even pose. Supposedly we are to assume these two people in that garden - Adam and Eve were in this state of perfect happiness where Time itself seems to stand still. And the first person who realized that Time did NOT stand still - - was Satan, and he used this bit of knowledge to his own advantage. (Selah)
We have used the term as of late The AXIS to mean some sort of Moral Enforcer or Karma or what have you. An inherent Limiter and over-reaching control device, on all human and ETI affairs. According to what I'll call the Neil Asphenol doctrine - - - (pssst - - Apple Record's Accountant) This AXIS is what "The Universe revolves around". One might say that all of Creation is "alligned in comformity with this Axis". We have also spoken of an Axis in the Sketch program as being a dimension reference point. We have also spoken of the idea that each Time Axis has its own specific laws of Cause and Effect and there is an inherent incompatability between the Axes. I guess one might inquire whether there is any actual Causal connection between this Axis being an "enforcer of karma and morality" or just an axis of straight line Time. Does Time itself inherently carry a moral componet. We know that words like Cause and Effect are morally charged words and that it's important to get the causes and effects in the right order. We have also spoken of the idea of the two sided pancake. It was in March 2010 I believe, that I came up with the saying "It has been said that any pancake no matter how thin - - has two sides to it". This is true and each side is different and unique to itself. You'll get no argument here. But that there are certain kinds of statements which Inherently won't admit to this sort of three dimensional Logic. For instance equations in math and geometry- - are often inherently two dimensional arguments in nature. That is- - they are based entirely on Theory and not the way things Actually Are in this Material Universe. Because any actual quantifiable Event in this Universe has - - Three Dimensions. By saying "this argument does not merit three dimensional thinking' is to say that the Statement is so DEVOID of any substance or Reality- - - there IS no substance, hence there IS no third dimension. In a two dimensional argument you move to the other side of the glass- - and the argument looks exactly the same- - except in reverse, of course. Any argument has its converse and inverse arguments. The word Inverse is more appropriate here. For certain moral Absolutes there IS no "Other Side". There is only the singular Truth. Trying to find substance in an argument that is devoid of any - - is the source of a lot of needless pain. It's reducable to a doctrine of "You can't deal with what isn't there". Perhaps this is what they refer to as "logical positivism" but I'm by no means sure of that one. I find no "other side of the coin" in Tea Party logic. There simply IS no way you can twist reality enough to say we'd have been better off with Mitt Romney as President. Almost any other alternative- - no matter how distasteful - - is preferable to Mitt Romney becomming President. You see with our side people don't believe Barock Obama is Perfect. But we think we have to "take what we can get". But with the other side- -Mitt Romney is the living embodiment of Perfection. And if you talked to these people during the campaign, there is not One Thing about Mitt Romney that they would change. Many people say if it weren't for Time they'd be fine. No doubt this is the moment they just announced the Lottery numbers and perhaps they actually won a few thousand. (Before the tax people get it) For others- - one might say -as Spock did in one StarTrek episode - - "Obviously the man is incapable of three dimensional thinking". But as to whether there is something Inherent in the very Nature of Time that is an Enforcer of Morality- - I don't know. So far I haven't constructed any physical model or example to illustrate this phenominon. But perhaps I will- - in not that long of a time, either.
Karma, or that other Hindu term Dharma (or destiny) is something you can't run away from - - either in Time or in Space. Keep in mind that your fate and your deeds alike can be said to be "hard wired into your overall destiny". There is a doctrine of course since Karma, or to be technical, Dharma - is Inescapable- - - then it may be deemed as transcendant and absolute. And being Absolute therefore can't be questions just as the Justice of it's "rewards" be they good or adverse- - may not be questioned. This doesn't have to be "Fair". Someone with a bad destiny is in the influence of something that cannot be "overcome" by will, sheer grit, moral resolve, or endless repentance. And it can certainly not be overcome with compliance or humility. If President Obama is destined to be a Loser- - than a Loser he shall be. I guess he has a choice. He can be called an "angry Black man" or a "Nigger out of control" or what have you, if he acts too proactively or decisively. Or he can be judged by History is some sort of a spineless whoos who will sell out his Principles at the drop of a hat, and Still Fail. (Selah) I have my own suggestions as to what he should do at this point, but I don't have his ear and he's going to make the mistakes anyhow.
Right now I would suggest to Most Readers that they jump right to the Final Paragraph, because they'll find it a whole lot more relevent as something they can learn a lesson from. This paragraph really doesn't belong in this posting but I don't know where exactly else to put it. It's a follow up on an advanced theory of "ideal karmic progress", and we know what is "ideal" most times does not go as planned. This covers a topic we've given the foundation and background of previously - - as an ideal state of Progress based strictly based on mathematical and geometric formulas not discussed here, and if you're a new reader you'd have a great deal of difficulty picking up on what I'm talking about. Now we proceed. It has come to my attention that some of you are wondering just what I meant when I spoke of an "off Axis cosmic existence or one might say "An abnormally closed hyperbola". This would be where the two fundamental "axes" of your life progress graph were alligned at angles other than ninety degrees. For the benefit of the few new people reading it's a basic structural conflict in your - - present physical incarnation where you are in definite danger of slipping out of your present physical existence and life into that of another. (See - I told you you wouldn't understand) Expressed in a time and progress graph this would have the unusual trait of - - "being in two places at the same time" if for instance a line turned so abruptly up (positive) that it doubled back on itself a little. We spoke as such off axis relations as "being cosmically unstable in the Universe or localle in which you reside". This "gap" on continuity of progress or existence - if an Illustration of HOW such a state could come to arise in one's life. It does not per se prove THAT one actually Has said dual existance. One might envision it as - - - there is some Famous person out there- - whose achievements are somehow something You come to "own" just as you own your Own. One might call it - - like a railroad car wheel or a closet door runner- - not securely in the grove. This is one application of the "closing parabola sidrone". One could just as easily say that one's "life was headed in a downward (declining) direction and then just "turned around". This too is possible, and indeed probable were there, for instance, bad karma in your immediate past life that had reached its "call date" at they would say in stock exchange terms. We have also stated using all three aspects of the hyperbolic trig curve - - shown how a seemingly disasterous and ill-fated "decline" or "reversal of life" can have in this very symptum the "seeds of greatness". The Dao Te Ching teaches the concept of the polar opposite circles being "contained' by their opposites. But were one's cosmic time-progress hyperbola bend so profoundly as to revert to a circle (caused by excessive axis inclination) it would be said that one would take on the Destiny of whatever it had encircled. This is one of those cosmic laws you should ask your local eastern guru about.
The idea that there are TEXTUAL ADDITIONS in the Gospel records can be easily illustrated from the following example. It is written "If a brother sins, rebuke him of it and if he repents you have won him back. If he sins again - - take two or three other brothers with you and do the same thing. If still he does not mend his sinful ways- - haul him before the entire congragation and rebuke him before all. If still he will not mend his ways - - - then "Ye shall treat him as you would a sinner or a tax collecter". What is apparent here is that Jesus Christ hung out with - - "sinners and tax collecters' and was criticized much for it. Also in our story how many chances is the guy given before he's "dis-fellowshipped"? You answer "Three". Well, when Jesus was asked how often you must forgive a brother who sins Jesus responded "Not seven - - but seven times seventy", which would be a minimum of 490 times. By that bar standard- this "brothers' tale falls far short.
No comments:
Post a Comment