WHAT MORE EVIDENCE DO THOSE ON THE FAR-RIGHT NEED?
A couple of days ago I was thinking of writing a fictional story about some people from the Secret Service taking candidate Barock Obama aside and telling him the “score’ if he ever gets elected and who really runs the country. It takes very little imagination to suppose that President Obama is just a pawn in someone else’s game. Clearly he has tools of Wall Street setting his economic policy. He’s conducting three simotanious wars when he ran as the anti war candidate and Hillary made that a major issue. It stretches the imagination very little to suppose “Homeland Security” was an organization already in existence that in fact George W Bush set up to help get him into power and that 9 – 11 was just an excuse to take our civil liberties away and go to war, because these items were on Bush’s agenda already. Bush got rid of that computer system set up in the latter days of the Clinton administration to help track down potential terrorists, saying he wanted to set up his own system - - sometime later. Also there was a movie that came out in 1996 that quoted Al Qaeda in saying that they were going to vastly amplify on the truck bombing of the World Trade center in 1993 and this time they were going to take out four thousand people. Well, it wasn’t fiction. It also takes very little imagination to even suppose that detonation charges were deliberately set in the Twin Towers prior to when they collapsed to greatly increase the loss of lives and garner more headlines and sympathy. Anyone who’s seen the video of the buildings going down can’t help but conclude explosives were already in the buildings. Of course there has been the “red shift” in election results since the year 2000. The D Bolt voting machine or whatever it’s called was hacked in 2006 and someone demonstrated how easy it would be to change vote tally results. The CEO of the company apparently admitted it’s an avowed goal of his to insure republican victories. What more evidence do you need?
Of course the whole tea party movement is a phoney bologna movement. It was organized by big money. Let’s review a few facts. They say all the President wants is “more tax and spend policies”. In reality a large portion of the economic stimulus, perhaps too much of it, has come through major across the board tax cuts. Now the President is willing to agree to an 85% and 15% ratio to solve the debt limit crisis, meaning 85% of the deficit reduction comes from government spending cuts and only fifteen percent from enhanced revenue. Federal government revenues over the last ten years are down 24%. I bet you didn’t know that. Spending on discretionary income has remained flat.; In terms of the dreaded national debt, Ronald Reagan did substantially more damage in this area as far as running up the deficit simply because the interest rates were so much higher them. Back then it would be eight percent or even higher whereas now it’s around one percent. Ronald Reagan did away with the
Let me refresh your memory of the Donald Siegalman case. He was a former governor of
Casey Anthony was acquitted on the three major charges involving the pre-meditated murder of her two year old daughter in
No comments:
Post a Comment