Well Don't Gloat Too Much!

A basic false premise of Born Again Christianity is illustrated by the following dialog

In that nuggets commercial - - where the girls falsely claim they were raided by a nuggets thief - - Jack offers to get them more nuggets, and the girls loudly protest that they don't want any.  And if Jack were a born again preacher like Chuck Smith - - he would praise the two girls for ":having transcended their hunger.  But if the boys said "Give us nuggets" Jack might well say, "You know I could do that but I think you'll grow spiritually more if you react the same way as the girls did and refuse the nuggets, and you'll thank me for it later."

If there is one thing that really stuck in my craw on Saturday night's Mc Laughlin group it's the phrase of "Amnesty" connected with immigration.  They said that no Republican House member would ever go for an Immigration bill if Amnesty was involved, which to me kind of defeats the whole purpose of the thing to mainstream a large segment of society that would like forgiveness for a past wrong they may have comited.  To hear these Republicans they don't know what you're talking about because they think they're perfect.  May I remind you that these Rich Financiers who complain the most about how they are "abused" by the tax system- - received by some accounts Three Trillion dollars from the Federal government- - - which they haven't paid back yet.  Some people commit what I call "The sin of the bread man".  They will reason that if you see a guilty man being given amnesty- - than certainly you, an innocent man should receive it.  Somewhere along the way God gave me the insight that the Bread Man alias the king's baker in the story about Joseph- - was in fact the innocent of the two men and that the baker went on to be incarnated as Samson and then King David.  They may not have been perfect men but they had a pure heart when it came to facing their own sin and repentance.  Whereas in my version- - it's the wine man who was in fact guilty- - and was reincarnated as Britanicus, or Emperor Claudious son and Nero's half brother.  Nero's mother had him killed, by poisoning the wine he drank, though he was only fourteen.  Many people, and I suspect the Protigal son - - know how to "work the system".  There is a guy named Mike I know and I might forgive him his debt to me if he would but face it and admit it and just say "What do I have to do to settle up".  But he's forever trying to get one more perk- - like the Wall Street people as the economy was falling apart in 2008.  How can I make that last financial killing before the walls fall in?  Jesus told a parable about The Two Debtors, I suggest that the tea party republicans read.  One man was forgiven much- - but in return he would not countenance his brother, who needed forgiving little, even the slightest bit of "amnesty" or even a grace period.  So the minorities who have lived here twenty years and worked hard and reason to themselves "Surely I have earned the right by now to be called an American", but the rich Wall Street and tea party crowd, who have already been forgiven much and even now continue to get away with much mischief, will deny them the slightest bit of "grace".  I think you know how Jesus Christ feels about them.

Wouldn't you know it?  The Mc Laughlin group, the most conservative show on the main stream media had to pick on that little story the rest of the media had the good sense to ignore- - the one about how we may be at last in that long awaited double dip recession the right wingers have so longingly been predicting.  But one has to wonder why they are STILL predicting and still hoping for one.  I guess nobody told them the national election was last year, and the President has four more years in office.  But sill like an aging movie star hanging around the Studio hoping against hope she'll get one more starring role in a movie, so the "groupies" are still waiting for some sort of economic calamity to brighten their day.  They love to cite the bit about how we are going into debt and stimulating the hell out of this economy and still economic growth is so weak and not like the "good old days of robust growth" under Ronald Reagan.  I was waiting for the first hint of the problem being how "The president has raised and raised taxes on all sectors of the economy to heights never seen before in American history so no longer the economy is laboring."  After all this is what Judy believes and Judy is a Christian in good standing and therefore would never be taken in by a false belief.  After all the Bible says that "Being taken in by a false belief" is a sign your Christian faith is in jeopardy.  But as it was the best these people on Mc Laughlin could muster is just to say "We don't know what the hell is wrong with the US economy".  I appreciate an honest answer.  But that means that if the cause of our economic stagnation is of "idipathic origen" that means you can't rightly pin the blame on President Obama, can you?  I remember Bill Clinton's promise last summer in his convention speech that "You know we are in a recovery now - we just don't Feel it yet, but take my word for it, soon we Will begin to actually Feel as though we are truly in a recovery, just like we did in 1995.  Let's hope so.  But just to make it official, here is the actual news report I went into the vaults and dug out.

The economy in the U.S. unexpectedly came to a standstill in the fourth quarter as the biggest plunge in defense spending in 40 years swamped gains for consumers and businesses.   Gross domestic product dropped at a 0.1 percent annual rate, weaker than any economist forecast in a Bloomberg survey and the worst performance since the second quarter of 2009, when the world’s largest economy was still in the recession, Commerce Department figures showed today in Washington. A decline in government outlays and a smaller gain in stockpiles subtracted a combined 2.6 percentage points from growth.    Rising auto sales led the advance in consumer spending last quarter as a drop in fuel prices and the largest income gain in four years enabled the biggest part of the economy to overcome superstorm Sandy and Washington budget battles. Little inflation and a stop-and-go expansion are why Federal Reserve policy makers, who wrapped up a two-day meeting today, pressed on with plans to pump more money into financial markets.   “I’m not going to say growth is particularly strong, but this is not a recessionary signal by any means,” said Paul Edelstein, director of financial economics at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts, whose team projected a 0.3 percent gain, the lowest in the Bloomberg survey. “This really was a story about a payback in national defense spending. Consumer- spending growth picked up, fixed investment was fairly strong.”

Pat Buchannon was of more help in defending liberalism, or as I refer to it nowadays, "Sanity" in other areas.  Apparently some have called Chuck Hagel anti Semetic.  You know who is really anti-semetic don't you?  Those would be the Christians who are expecting Israel to incinerate itself in a Nuclear Haulocost in the Great Tribulation after the Christians have all been removed from the earth.  It's kind of akin to what Christians like Judy believe about ecology and safer forms of energy.  They say that "No matter what we do it won't have any impact on the Earth for another hundred years so what the hell is the point?"  Well the POINT is events like Hurricane Sandy that are happening NOW.  You have a really BAD hurricane so far north and so late into the fall.  But these people believe, like George Bush must have thought, "Hell I can make just as big a mess as I care to now, and leave it to posterity to clean up the mess".  This is just how Christians think.  Personally if I were God, which admittedly I am not', I would not take too kindly to this line of reasoning.  Pat was saying that Hagel is not anti semetic and that Chuck Schumer, who I always regarded as just another liberal, is in fact Jewish, or at least Yiddish, and if Schummer doesn't think Hagal is anti-semetic, then this is good enough for Pat.  The whole problem with the Surge of 2007 in Irag is that apparently twelve hundred troop's lives were lost and this constituted about a quarter of the entire losses in the whole eight year war in Iraq.  And as Pat points out, it was an ill advised War to begin with - - and to just focus in on one battle plan, and ignore the whole rest of the course of the War, and how we got into that war- - is tunnel vision at its worst.  This was a week when at least austensively, Eleanor Clift was the lone liberal of the group, though I must say for at least some of that time, Pat Buchannon was actually playing on our team.

There are a few of you out there who say you can prove that my version of matter that behaves as though it had negative mass CANNOT exist in the sense I describe it.  They would point out to the fact that I stipulate that both heavier than aether and lighter than aether matter- - both relate to the aether, ans as such, if heavier than aether generates positive gravity, then lighter than aether matter would have to generate similarly measurable phenomina in a common mode of transmission being the aether.  But there is one glitch in their reason as anyone who's had their blood pressure taken realizes.  Because you know that blood has to be a certain pressure to generate a blip in the stethascope to be actually heard as pulsations or waves.  Since lighter than aether matter is lighter and less dense than aether, it cannot possibly generate the force needed, try as it might, to generate ANY sort of waves, positive or negative.  But here is an interesting thought.  Is the possability of SIN is the price we pay for mere Existance, as I have postulated with heaver than ether matter- - - then it would follow that Existance would have an inherent MERIT and an intrinsic source of Power and virtue in that other world.  How interesting it is that in the karmic funnel as we portray it, you want to be anywhere BUT that big "newtron star hole" in the middle.  But you know that indeed that that very well you dread IS you.  It's your "price of existance".  But in that other world- - - you Exist anywhere "Outside the hyperbola".  And as we attempted to say before each Individuals "Hyperbola" or area where he exists- - - or more to the point the "Area where any given individual can't go - - can't venture - - outside his Event Horizon - - - we maintain THAT individual of a reading (fix on location) is different for Every Individual.  And we believe that the direction or whatever of this "area within the hyperbola - - of Non Existance- - is present even if two people are right in the room talking with each other with NO GAP in Distance at all, like a bunch of people gathered around a board playing Chinese checkers.  The concept of Distance- - - as a "problem to overcome" doesn't really Exist in that world.  But what DOES exist- as we alluded to previous is a "general non agreement" on What we See when we view the World, because over there two people right next to each other in truth "Live in a whole different world - -  with different circumstances" (Selah)